
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>According to the manner of tissue preparation, immunocytochemical techniques are broadly divided into two groups, nonembedding and embedding techniques. In the nonembedding techniques, there are immunoferritin (Tokuyasu and Singer, 1976) and protein A-gold techniques (Geuze et al., 1981) using ultracryosections, and surface labelling of freeze fracture preparations (Pinto da Silva and Branton, 1970). According to the step by which the immunological reaction is performed, the embedding techniques could be further divided into two groups, pre-embedding and post-embedding techniques. In the former, immunoperoxidase (Nakane and Pierce, 1967) and immunoferritin (Willingham et al., 1981, 1984) were mainly used while, in the latter, the protein A-gold probes were primarily employed (Roth et al., 1978).
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
