<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
More and more people are employing complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) to treat their illnesses. A survey of English-speaking patients found that 42.1% used at least 1 of 16 specific CAM therapies during a 12-month period (1). In this study population, visits to CAM practitioners exceeded total visits to primary care physicians, and more than 50% of the patients had a musculoskeletal disease (arthritis, back, or neck pain). Total out-of-pocket expenditures for CAM treatments were estimated to be $27 billion, similar to out-of-pocket expenditures for all US physician services. The study found that patients were most likely to use CAM therapies in conjunction with, rather than in place of, conventional therapies
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |