
handle: 10281/44010
Two, seemingly different modular techniques for concurrent system development are investigated from a categorical perspective. A novel approach is presented in which they turn out to be merely special instances of pullback, a general categorical limit construction. Interestingly, the approach is based on truly concurrent semantics of systems.
MODULARITY, [INFO.INFO-OH] Computer Science [cs]/Other [cs.OH], PETRI NETS, CATEGORY OF ASYNCHRONOUS TRANSITION SYSTEMS, CONCURRENT SYSTEMS, concurrency; modularity; compositionality, PULLBACKS
MODULARITY, [INFO.INFO-OH] Computer Science [cs]/Other [cs.OH], PETRI NETS, CATEGORY OF ASYNCHRONOUS TRANSITION SYSTEMS, CONCURRENT SYSTEMS, concurrency; modularity; compositionality, PULLBACKS
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
