
In Chapter 2, Section 2.2, we showed how one can start with a transition probability function P(s, x; t, ·) and end up with a Markov process. The problem is: where does P(s, x; t, ·) come from? The example we gave there, namely: $$ P(s,x;t,\Gamma ) = \int\limits_\Gamma {g_d } \left( {t - s,y - x} \right)dy $$ (11) is a natural one from the probabilistic point of view because of its connection with independent increments and Gaussian processes. It turns out to be natural from another point of view as well: the theory of second order parabolic partial differential equations. The connection between the P(s, x; t, ·) in (1.1) and partial differential equations is well-known and easy to derive. Namely, if ϕ ∈ C b (R d ) and $$ f(s,\,x)\, = \,\int {g_d (T\, - \,s,\,y\, - \,x)\phi (y)\,dy,\,s < \,T,} $$ then $$ \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\frac{{\partial f}} {{\partial s}} + \frac{1} {2}\Delta f\, = \,0,\,s\, < \,T,} \\ {\mathop {\lim }\limits_{s\dag T} f(s, \cdot \,)\, = \,\phi } \\ \end{array} } \right. $$ (1.2) where Δ is Laplace’s operator $$ \sum\limits_1^d {\frac{{\partial ^2 }} {{\partial x_i^2 }}}. $$
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
