Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2005 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2000 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The Intestinal Anastomosis

Authors: Moshe Schein;

The Intestinal Anastomosis

Abstract

The ideal intestinal anastomosis is the one that does not leak, for leaks, although relatively rare, represent a dreaded and potentially deadly disaster (• Chap. 50). In addition, the anastomosis should not obstruct, allowing normal function of the gastrointestinal tract within a few days of construction. Any experienced surgeon thinks that his or her anastomotic technique, adopted from mentors and with a touch of personal virtuosity, is the “best.” Many methods are practiced: end to end, end to side, or side to side; single versus double layered, interrupted versus continuous, using absorbable versus nonabsorbable and braided versus monofilament suture materials. We even know some obsessive-compulsive surgeons (do you know any?) who carefully construct a three-layered anastomosis in an interrupted fashion. Now, add staplers to the mix. So, where do we stand; what is preferable (• Fig. 13.1)?

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?