
doi: 10.1007/11958239_20
Especially for key establishment protocols to be used in internet applications, the (privacy) concern of deniability arises: Can a protocol transcript be used—possibly by a participant—to prove the involvement of another party in the protocol? For two party key establishment protocols, a common technique for achieving deniability is the replacement of signature-based message authentication with authentication based on symmetric keys. We explore the question of deniability in the context of group key establishment : Taking into account malicious insiders, using a common symmetric key for authentication is critical, and the question of how to achieve deniability arises. Building on a model of Bresson et al., we offer a formalization of deniability and present a group key agreement offering provable security in the usual sense, deniability, and security guarantees against malicious insiders. Our approach for achieving deniability through a suitably distributed Schnorr-signature might also be of independent interest.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
