
doi: 10.1007/11946441_39
Distributed protocols that run in dynamic environments such as the Internet are often not able to use an upper bound on the number of potentially participating processes. In these settings adaptive and uniform algorithms are desirable where the step complexity of all operations is a function of the number of concurrently participating processes (adaptive) and the algorithm does not need to know an upper bound on the number of participating processes (uniform). Adaptive algorithms, however, are generally not adaptive with respect to their memory consumption – if no upper bound on the number of participating processes is known in advance – they require unbounded MWMR registers and an unbounded number of such registers (even if only finitely many distinct processes appear), making them impractical for real systems. In this paper we ask whether this must be the case: Can adaptive algorithms where no upper bound on the number of participating processes is known in advance be uniformly implemented with finite memory (if only finitely many distinct processes keep reappearing)? We will show that in the dynamic setting it is impossible to implement long-lived adaptive splitters, collect and renaming with infinitely many bounded MWMR registers, making such adaptive algorithms impractical in dynamic settings. On the positive side we provide algorithms that implement a long-lived uniform adaptive splitter if unbounded registers are available and that implement a non-uniform adaptive splitter with finitely many bounded registers if an upper bound on the number of participating processes is known in advance.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
