
doi: 10.1007/11853886_3
Traditionally, theorem provers have been used to prove theorems with relatively small axiomatisations. The recent development of large ontologies poses a non-trivial challenge of reasoning with axiomatisations consisting of hundreds of thousands axioms. In the near future much larger ontologies will be available. These ontologies will be created by large groups of people and by computer programs and will contain knowledge of varying quality. In the talk we describe an adaptation of the theorem prover Vampire for reasoning with large ontologies using expressive logics. For our experiments we used SUMO and the terrorism ontology. Based on the analysis of inconsistencies found in these ontologies we analyse the quality of information in them. Our research reveals interesting problems in studying the evolution and the quality of formal knowledge. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
