
doi: 10.1007/11780441_1
This paper introduces a new pattern matching model that has been gaining importance recently, that of Asynchronous Pattern Matching. Traditional pattern matching has assumed the possibility of errors in the data content. We present motivation from text editing, computational biology, and computer architecture, that points to a new paradigm – where the errors occur in the address. It turns out that there are differences in techniques, complexities, and tools between the two different models, making it important to recognize their differences. We motivate and define the new model and present some problems that are worth pursuing.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
