Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
https://doi.org/10.1007/117680...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2006 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Conference object . 2017
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Adapting NLP to Adaptive Hypermedia

Authors: Jon Oberlander;

Adapting NLP to Adaptive Hypermedia

Abstract

Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques ought to be really useful for people building adaptive hypermedia (AH) systems. This talk explores the gap between theory and practice, illustrating it with examples of things that do (and don’t work), and it suggests a way of closing the gap. The examples are mainly drawn from collaborative work I’ve been involved with over the last decade, on a series of AH systems using NLP: ILEX, SOLE, M-PIRO and Methodius. In theory, NLP sub-systems should help find, filter and format information for re-presentation in AH systems. So there ought to be lots of cross-fertilisation between NLP and AH. It is true that some projects have effectively brought them together; particularly on the formatting—or information presentation—side, natural language generation systems have allowed quite fine-grained personalisation of information to the language, interests and history of individual users. But in practice, NLP has been less useful to AH than one might have expected. Now, one reason for this is that the information to be presented has to come from somewhere, and NLP support for AH authors is not as good as it should be. Arguably, where NLP could really make a difference is on the finding and filtering side. State-of-the-art information extraction tools can increase author productivity, and help make fine-grained personalisation more practical.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!