
doi: 10.1007/11736790_25
We describe the system we used at the PASCAL-2005 Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge. Our method for recognizing entailment is based on calculating “directed” sentence similarity: checking the directed “semantic” word overlap between the text and the hypothesis. We use frequency-based term weighting in combination with two different word similarity measures. Although one version of the system shows significant improvement over randomly guessing decisions (with an accuracy score of 57.3), we show that this is only due to a subset of the data that can be equally well handled by simple word overlap. Furthermore, we give an in-depth analysis of the system and the data of the challenge.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
