Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ http://www.cse.iitd....arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
http://www.cse.iitd.ernet.in/~...
Part of book or chapter of book
Data sources: UnpayWall
https://doi.org/10.1007/116025...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2005 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Conference object
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Sensor Selection Heuristic in Sensor Networks

Authors: Vaishali P. Sadaphal; Bijendra N. Jain;

Sensor Selection Heuristic in Sensor Networks

Abstract

We consider the problem of estimating the location of a moving target in a 2-D plane. In this paper, we focus attention on selecting an appropriate 3rd sensor, given two sensors, with a view to minimize the estimation error. Only the selected sensors need to measure distance to the target and communicate the same to the central “tracker”. This minimizes bandwidth and energy consumed in measurement and communication while achieving near minimum estimation error. In this paper, we have proposed that the 3rd sensor be selected based on three measures viz. (a) collinearity, (b) deviation from the ideal direction in which the sensor should be selected, and (c) proximity of the sensor from the target. We assume that the measurements are subject to multiplicative error. Further, we use least square error estimation technique to estimate the target location. Simulation results show that using the proposed algorithm it is possible to achieve near minimum error in target location.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Top 10%
Average