
doi: 10.1007/11590156_25
Timed systems can be considered with two types of semantics – dense time semantics and discrete time semantics. The most typical examples of both of them are real semantics and sampled semantics (i.e., discrete semantics with a fixed time step e). We investigate the relations between real semantics and sampled semantics with respect to different behavioral equivalences. Also, we study decidability of reachability problem for stopwatch automata with sampled semantics. Finally, our main technical contribution is decidability of non-emptiness of a timed automaton ω-language in some sampled semantics (this problem was previously wrongly classified as undecidable). For the proof we employ a novel characterization of reachability relations between configurations of a timed automaton.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
