
doi: 10.1007/11508373_23
A rather common way of formalizing contexts as first class objects starts from the basic relation ist(c,p) which asserts that the proposition p is true in the context c. However, the space in which terms take values may itself be context-sensitive. Our aim is to introduce contexts as abstract mathematical entities in a more general framework which includes context-sensitivity, namely knowledge represented by contextual information systems. Making use of some concepts from the Rough Set Theory we refine two relations: the indiscernibility relation between the objects and the similarity relation between the contexts within a contextual information system. Both relations are illustrated with examples showing how contextual information systems can express in a natural way a very few well known phenomena. Based on these relations we propose a simple strategy for decreasing the ambiguity of contextual information systems.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
