
doi: 10.1007/11493785_13
In this paper, we look at extended splicing systems (i.e., H systems) in order to find how small such a system can be in order to generate a recursively enumerable language. It turns out that starting from a Turing machine M with alphabet A and finite set of states Q which generates a given recursively enumerable language L, we need around 2 × |I| + 2 rules in order to define an extended H system ${\cal H}$ which generates L, where I is the set of instructions of Turing machine M. Next, coding the states of Q and the non-terminal symbols of ${\cal L}$, we obtain an extended H system ${\cal H}_1$ which generates L using |A| + 2 symbols. At last, by encoding the alphabet, we obtain a splicing system ${\cal U}$ which generates a universal recursively enumerable set using only two letters.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
