
Abstract The methods of constructing life tables using mortality data From capture-mark-recapture studies are reviewed. A stochastic model was produced to simulate cohort mortality and produce mortality estimates derived by three methods: (i) fusion-cohort analysis, entering each individual from the time of capture to the time of death; (ii) pseudo-cohort analysis, placing each individual in the table From time of birth; and (iii) pseudo-cohort plus cadaver analysis, including unmarked individuals where they can be successfully aged. The accuracy of the three construction methods was compared for differing levels of mortality, cadaver recovery, probability of capture, and number of capture attempts. The accuracy of these methods is presented graphically and general recommendations are made.
Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis
Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
