Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Pharmacological Rese...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Pharmacological Research
Article . 2001 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
Pharmacological Research
Article . 2001
Data sources: Europe PubMed Central
https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/phr...
Article
Data sources: Microsoft Academic Graph
 View all 2 versions
Claim

Bioequivalent or Nonbioequivalent?

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Jun 2001 English Publisher:Elsevier BVJournal:Pharmacological Research, volume 43, pages 543-546 (issn: 1043-6618, Copyright policy )
Authors: A, Rescigno; J, Powers; E E, Herderick;

doi: 10.1006/phrs.2001.0820

pmid: 11419963

Bioequivalent or Nonbioequivalent?

Abstract

The current tests for bioequivalence are based on assumptions that are not valid in general; this paper shows why it is necessary to use a method that does not depend upon assumptions that cannot, and need not, be proved in general.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Time Factors, Therapeutic Equivalency, United States Food and Drug Administration, Area Under Curve, Humans, Guidelines as Topic, Pharmacokinetics, United States

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!
uploadUpload now