
pmid: 10764606
Bioassays constitute a unique approach to determine the functional aspects of gonadotropins. Indeed, these highly complex glycoprotein hormones, including pituitary lutropin (LH) and follitropin (FSH), are heterogeneous in terms of both peptidic and carbohydrate moieties, and, as a consequence, the bioactivity of the different molecular forms often does not match their immunoreactivity. In this article, we review the different types of LH and FSH bioassays. Conventional methods for measuring FSH bioactivity are first described and include the in vivo Steelman and Pohley bioassay, the radioligand receptor assays (RRAs), the in vitro Sertoli cell bioassay, the in vitro granulosa cell bioassay, and the inhibin immunoassay. Recent methods based on cell lines transfected with cloned receptors, particularly the human FSH receptor, are then described. Methods for developing these assays are presented, and the advantages and disadvantages of the different bioassays are discussed.
Immunoassay, Male, DNA, Complementary, Granulosa Cells, Leydig Cells, CHO Cells, EMC MM-01-52-07, Cell Line, Rats, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Radioligand Assay, Cricetinae, Animals, Humans, Receptors, FSH, Biological Assay, Female, Inhibins, Cloning, Molecular, Luciferases, Gonadotropins
Immunoassay, Male, DNA, Complementary, Granulosa Cells, Leydig Cells, CHO Cells, EMC MM-01-52-07, Cell Line, Rats, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Radioligand Assay, Cricetinae, Animals, Humans, Receptors, FSH, Biological Assay, Female, Inhibins, Cloning, Molecular, Luciferases, Gonadotropins
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
