
The institution of electoral politics is considered. The authors use the classical Downsian model of electoral competition in which two parties compete for the vote of the electorate in a symmetric zero-sum, perfect information game. This paper raises the question of the level of inequality generated by Downsian competition for redistribution. The apparatus of a general spatial model of elections is applied. In the division problem the basic results are threefold: 1. The authors derive how far one can go by sticking to pure strategies and narrowing the set of possible outcomes on the basis of dominance-like arguments; 2. optimal strategies are exhibited; 3. the authors offer a sample of quantitative estimates of how unequal the distributions proposed at equilibrium are.
Noncooperative games, Downsian model, Voting theory, distributive politics, electoral competition
Noncooperative games, Downsian model, Voting theory, distributive politics, electoral competition
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 79 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
