
In pursuing bank privatization, governments in Central Europe and Russia faced a common set of policy issues, including how to break up the monobank system, deal with troubled loans, transfer equity to the private sector, and attract capital to the banks. For each bank undergoing privatization, the government's approach to such issues determines its transactional structure. We develop this conceptual framework and assess the findings from three studies of major commercial banks undergoing privatization. The varied transactional structures used in these privatizations appear to have had significant effects on each bank's microstructure and to influence bank strategy and post-privatization performance.J. Comp. Econom.,August 1997,25(1), pp. 5–30. The William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan Business School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109; and University of Michigan Business School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 and The William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan Business School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
