
Individual votes in group decisions are here modeled on a framework of inference on parameters determining the distribution of received signals. It is proven that, as the size of the jury increase, the probability of a mistaken judgment goes to zero unless unanimity is needed and the likelihood ratio is bounded. Conditions in terms of the ratio between hazard rates are also set.
voting rules, Condorce jury theorem, Applications of game theory, responsive cutoff equilibrium, Voting theory, Games in extensive form
voting rules, Condorce jury theorem, Applications of game theory, responsive cutoff equilibrium, Voting theory, Games in extensive form
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 89 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
