
pmid: 11578120
The ability to desiccate mammalian cells while maintaining a high degree of viability would have implications for many areas of biological science, including tissue engineering. Previously, we reported that introduction of the genes for trehalose biosynthesis allowed human cells in culture to be reversibly desiccated for up to 5 days. Here, we have further investigated the factors that allow human cells to survive in the desiccated state. The most important finding is that vacuum greatly enhances the ability of human cells in culture to withstand desiccation. In fact, cells dried slowly and stored under vacuum are able to withstand desiccation even in the absence of added carbohydrates or polyols. In addition to vacuum, the rate of desiccation, the temperature at which cells are maintained, the degree of confluence when dried, and the presence or absence of light have a large effect on the ability to retain viability in the desiccated state. Our data are consistent with a model in which cells can retain viability if they are desiccated in such a way that cellular structures are maintained. However, gradual loss of viability may be due to damage that occurs over time in the desiccated state, perhaps due to free radicals. Further optimization of the process for desiccating and maintaining cells is required before long-term storage of desiccated cells can be achieved.
Free Radicals, Light, Vacuum, Cell Survival, Polymers, Carbohydrates, Temperature, Trehalose, Trypan Blue, Models, Biological, Cell Line, Colony-Forming Units Assay, Humans, Desiccation, Coloring Agents
Free Radicals, Light, Vacuum, Cell Survival, Polymers, Carbohydrates, Temperature, Trehalose, Trypan Blue, Models, Biological, Cell Line, Colony-Forming Units Assay, Humans, Desiccation, Coloring Agents
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 100 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
