Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Clinical Immunologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Clinical Immunology
Article . 2000 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Evaluation of Assays for the Detection of Autoantibodies to the Ribosomal P Proteins

Authors: K, Rayno; M, Reichlin;

Evaluation of Assays for the Detection of Autoantibodies to the Ribosomal P Proteins

Abstract

Sera from systemic lupus erythematosus patients that had antibodies to the ribosomal P proteins were compared in several different assays. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method was compared to the Western immunoblotting method using either affinity purified human or bovine ribosomal P proteins. All 30 normal sera had no significant reactivity with these antigens. The most sensitive test was the ELISA using the human P protein, where 31/32 patients were positive (97%). The assay with bovine proteins in ELISA yielded 28/32 (88%) positive results. Immunoblotting with either bovine or human P protein was equally effective with 30/32 (94%) positive. An ELISA incorporating human P proteins is a more sensitive assay for clinical diagnosis than an ELISA with the bovine protein. Immunoblotting is a sensitive method, but is less convenient and is not quantitative. The ELISA with the human protein appears to be the method of choice.

Keywords

Ribosomal Proteins, Bacterial Proteins, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Blotting, Western, Animals, Humans, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Cattle, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Autoantibodies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    23
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
23
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!