Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Biological Controlarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Biological Control
Article . 1997 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Estimating Aphidophagous Coccinellid Populations in Alfalfa

Authors: N.C. Elliott; G.J. Michels;

Estimating Aphidophagous Coccinellid Populations in Alfalfa

Abstract

Abstract Precise yet time-efficient sampling methods for coccinellids would be useful in integrated pest management (IPM) research and decision-making in alfalfa. We compared quadrat sampling, removal sampling, counting coccinellids for a constant amount of time while walking slowly through a field (timed counts), and sweepnet sampling for estimating adult and larval coccinellid density in alfalfa. Removal sampling gave biased estimates of density of adultColeomegilla maculataDegeer, but gave acceptable estimates of density of adults of other species. Regression models were developed to convert relative population estimates of adult and larval coccinellids obtained by sweepnet and timed count sampling to absolute population estimates (number per m2). For adults, plant height was included in the best regression models for converting sweepnet catch and timed counts to population density. For larvae, plant growth stage was included in the best regression model for converting sweepnet catch to density. The number of aphids per 10 sweeps was included in the model for converting timed counts of larvae to density; however, this model was of little value because it explained only 13% of the variation in the relationship between timed counts and population density. Coefficients of determination of regression models for estimating adult density from timed count and sweepnet sampling were 0.90 and 0.93, respectively. The model for converting sweepnet catch of larvae had a coefficient of determination of 0.71. In terms of statistical precision achieved per unit time spent sampling, a 25-sweep sample was the most efficient sample unit for estimating adult density. A double 12-min removal sample was most efficient for sampling larvae, but this method gave biased estimates of larval density, and overall, sweepnet sampling was better.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    15
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
15
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!