
pmid: 10805515
Large-scale screening strategies aimed at finding anticancer drugs traditionally focus on identifying cytotoxic compounds that attack actively dividing cells. Because progression to malignancy involves acquisition of an aggressively invasive phenotype in addition to hyperproliferation, simple and effective screening strategies for finding compounds that target the invasive aspects of cancer progression may prove valuable for identifying alternative and preventative cancer therapies. Here, we describe a fluorescence-based automated assay for identifying antimigratory compounds, with the ability to discern cytotoxic from noncytotoxic modes of action. With this assay, we analyzed the effects of two drugs on tumorigenic (MDA-MB-435) and nontumorigenic (MCF-10A) human breast cell lines. We chose to compare carboxyamidotriazole (CAI), an experimental compound shown to inhibit migration of various cell types, with tamoxifen, a common preventative and therapeutic anticancer compound. Our assay demonstrated that both these compounds inhibit migration at sublethal concentrations. Furthermore, CAI was more effective than tamoxifen at inhibiting chemotactic and haptotactic migration of both cell lines at all concentrations tested.
Antineoplastic Agents, Breast Neoplasms, Triazoles, Fluoresceins, Tamoxifen, Spectrometry, Fluorescence, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Humans, Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor, Neoplasm Metastasis, Fluorescent Dyes, Propidium
Antineoplastic Agents, Breast Neoplasms, Triazoles, Fluoresceins, Tamoxifen, Spectrometry, Fluorescence, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Humans, Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor, Neoplasm Metastasis, Fluorescent Dyes, Propidium
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
