
pmid: 9888974
The quantitative capacity of the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is generally underestimated. In this study, PCR and RT-PCR products were amplified from serially diluted DNA and RNA templates, respectively, using a 35-cycle PCR. In the approximate 30- to 100-fold range of template input above the lower limit of detection, herpes simplex virus ICP27 RT-PCR product yield was dependent on the logarithm of template mRNA input (r2 = 0.99). Likewise, regression analysis indicated that yields of interleukin-12 p40, herpes simplex virus DNA polymerase, and interferon-gamma PCR products were dependent on the logarithm of template DNA input over 40- (r2 = 0.98), 60- (r2 = 0.96), and 100-fold (r2 = 0.99) ranges, respectively. This quantitative relationship appears to derive from the competition for reactants between specific PCR products and nonspecific primer-dimers that occurs at limiting concentrations of template. Although primer-dimers are not generally considered a common feature of PCR, 30 of 32 primer pairs tested in this study produced primer-dimer amplification in the absence of template. Because the coefficient of variation in replicate PCRs was typically 10-20% in the linear range, the precision of PCR was sufficient to measure 4-fold differences in template concentration. Thus, with statistically adequate sample numbers, an appropriate standard curve, and the inherent quantitative capacity of the method, differences in the abundance of a mRNA species are measurable by 35-cycle RT-PCR.
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Chlorocebus aethiops, Animals, Herpesvirus 1, Human, RNA, Messenger, Vero Cells, DNA Primers, Immediate-Early Proteins
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Chlorocebus aethiops, Animals, Herpesvirus 1, Human, RNA, Messenger, Vero Cells, DNA Primers, Immediate-Early Proteins
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 71 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
