Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Zoo Biologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Zoo Biology
Article . 1984 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Comparative gross anatomy of ratites

Authors: M.P. Anderson; Rosanne Brown; Patricia Cho;

Comparative gross anatomy of ratites

Abstract

AbstractThe four most common ratites kept in captivity, emus, rheas, ostriches, and cassowaries, share similar musculoskeletal features based on their common evolution to a flightless form. However, they differ in body size and coloration, wing size relative to entire body size, extent of leg feathering, and number of toes. During necropsies we observed the differences among the birds, which include the shape of tongue and tonsils, a tracheal cleft found only in emus, varied shapes of the thymus, spleen, bursa of Fabricius, proventriculus, duodenal loop, and ceca, different lengths of colon and ceca relative to the entire intestinal length, and different coloration of the gonads. Several of the structural differences reflect the phylogeny of the ratites. Rheas and ostriches share common features in relatively large wings, kidney‐bean shaped spleen, tan gonads, and long ceca, whereas emus and cassowaries have relatively small wings, short ceca, and similar proventriculi. The anatomical variations may reflect their varied diets in the wild and the different behaviors among the groups such as their characteristic vocalizations. Knowledge of the differences may be useful in formulating proper diets for captive birds and is important for the recognition of clinically normal structures in the ratites.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    41
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
41
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!