
pmid: 34664308
Abstract A number of fungal isolates were recently obtained from a survey of the microbiota of multiple breweries and brewery products. Here, we sought to explore whether any of these brewery contaminants could be repurposed for beneficial use in beer fermentations, with particular focus on low‐alcohol beer. There were 56 yeast strains first screened for the utilization of different carbon sources, ability to ferment brewer's wort, and formation of desirable aroma compounds. A number of strains appeared maltose‐negative and produced desirable aromas without obvious off‐flavours. These were selected for further scaled‐up wort fermentations. The selected strains efficiently reduced wort aldehydes during fermentation, thus eliminating undesirable wort‐like off‐flavours, and produced a diverse volatile aroma profile. Two strains, Trigonopsis cantarellii and Candida sojae , together with a commercial Saccharomycodes ludwigii reference strain, were selected for 30‐L‐scale wort fermentations based on aroma profile and similarity to a commercial reference beer during sensory analysis using projective mapping. Both strains performed comparably to the commercial reference, and the T. cantarellii strain in particular, produced low amounts of off‐flavours and a significantly higher amount of the desirable monoterpene alcohol trans ‐geraniol. The strain was also sensitive to common food preservatives and antifungal compounds and unable to grow at 37°C, suggesting it is relatively easily controllable in the brewery, and appears to have low risk of pathogenicity. This study shows how the natural brewery microbiota can be exploited as a source of non‐conventional yeasts for low‐alcohol beer production.
Flavoring Agents, Ethanol, Yeasts, ta1183, Fermentation, ta1182, Beer, SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
Flavoring Agents, Ethanol, Yeasts, ta1183, Fermentation, ta1182, Beer, SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
