
AbstractA number of different human pathogens code for their own enzymes involved in the synthesis of the RNA cap structure. Although the RNA cap structures originating from human and microbial enzymes are often identical, the subunit composition, structure and catalytic mechanisms of the microbial‐encoded enzymes involved in the synthesis of the RNA cap structure are often significantly different from those of host cells. As a consequence, these pathogenic cap‐forming enzymes are potential targets for antimicrobial drugs. During the past few years, experimental studies have started to demonstrate that inhibition of the RNA capping activity is a reasonable approach for the development of antimicrobial agents. The combination of structural, biochemical, and molecular modeling studies are starting to reveal novel molecules that can serve as starting blocks for the design of more potent and specific antimicrobial agents. Here, we examine various strategies that have been developed to inhibit microbial enzymes involved in the synthesis of the RNA cap structure, emphasizing the challenges remaining to design potent and selective drugs.WIREs RNA2011 2 184–192 DOI: 10.1002/wrna.43This article is categorized under:RNA Processing > Capping and 5' End Modifications
Models, Molecular, RNA Caps, mRNA Guanylyltransferases, RNA Cap Analogs, Models, Biological, Nucleotidyltransferases, Phosphates, Anti-Infective Agents, Drug Design, Animals, Humans, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Vanadates
Models, Molecular, RNA Caps, mRNA Guanylyltransferases, RNA Cap Analogs, Models, Biological, Nucleotidyltransferases, Phosphates, Anti-Infective Agents, Drug Design, Animals, Humans, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Vanadates
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
