
From transcription, to transport, storage, and translation, RNA depends on association with different RNA‐binding proteins (RBPs). Methods based on next‐generation sequencing and protein mass‐spectrometry have started to unveil genome‐wide interactions of RBPs but many aspects still remain out of sight. How many of the binding sites identified in high‐throughput screenings are functional? A number of computational methods have been developed to analyze experimental data and to obtain insights into the specificity of protein–RNA interactions. How can theoretical models be exploited to identify RBPs? In addition to oligomeric complexes, protein and RNA molecules can associate into granular assemblies whose physical properties are still poorly understood. What protein features promote granule formation and what effects do these assemblies have on cell function? Here, we describe the newest in silico, in vitro, and in vivo advances in the field of protein–RNA interactions. We also present the challenges that experimental and computational approaches will have to face in future studies. WIREs RNA 2016, 7:793–810. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1378This article is categorized under: RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein–RNA Recognition RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > RNA–Protein Complexes RNA in Disease and Development > RNA in Disease
Genòmica, Binding Sites, Animals; Binding Sites; Humans; Protein Binding; RNA; RNA-Binding Proteins; Biochemistry; Molecular Biology, Advanced Reviews, Animals, Humans, RNA, RNA-Binding Proteins, Proteïnes—Agregació, Protein Binding
Genòmica, Binding Sites, Animals; Binding Sites; Humans; Protein Binding; RNA; RNA-Binding Proteins; Biochemistry; Molecular Biology, Advanced Reviews, Animals, Humans, RNA, RNA-Binding Proteins, Proteïnes—Agregació, Protein Binding
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 107 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
