
AbstractObjectiveThe objective of this study is to provide a state‐of‐the‐art review on the use of anesthetics for in‐office facial plastic procedures.MethodsA search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Review using the keywords “anesthesia,” “office‐based procedures,” “local anesthesia,” “facial plastics,” “oral sedation,” “moderate sedation,” and “deep sedation.”Results and ConclusionsOver the past few decades, the shift toward in‐office invasive procedures has increased patient convenience and decreased hospital resource utilization. Many tools exist to reduce patient anxiety and discomfort in an office‐based setting. With proper patient selection and technique, facial plastic surgeons can adequately anesthetize patients to perform Mohs reconstruction, cutaneous excisions, blepharoplasty, face‐lifts, and other in‐office procedures.
Otorhinolaryngology, RF1-547, RD1-811, office‐based procedures, Surgery, facial plastic surgery, anesthesia, Review Articles
Otorhinolaryngology, RF1-547, RD1-811, office‐based procedures, Surgery, facial plastic surgery, anesthesia, Review Articles
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
