
doi: 10.1002/widm.36
AbstractExpressive comparison of strings is a prerequisite for analysis of sequential data in many areas of computer science. However, comparing strings and assessing their similarity is not a trivial task and there exists several contrasting approaches for defining similarity measures over sequential data. In this paper, we review three major classes of such similarity measures: edit distances, bag‐of‐word models, and string kernels. Each of these classes originates from a particular application domain and models similarity of strings differently. We present these classes and underlying comparisons in detail, highlight advantages, and differences as well as provide basic algorithms supporting practical applications. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.WIREs Data Mining Knowl Discov2011 1 296–304 DOI: 10.1002/widm.36This article is categorized under:Algorithmic Development > Biological Data MiningAlgorithmic Development > Text MiningFundamental Concepts of Data and Knowledge > Data ConceptsFundamental Concepts of Data and Knowledge > Key Design Issues in Data Mining
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
