
doi: 10.1002/widm.1514
AbstractFederated learning (FL) is a decentralized machine learning (ML) technique that enables multiple clients to collaboratively train a common ML model without them having to share their raw data with each other. A typical FL process involves (1) FL client(s) selection, (2) global model distribution, (3) local training, and (4) aggregation. As such FL clients are heterogeneous edge devices (i.e., mobile phones) that differ in terms of computational resources, training data quality, and distribution. Therefore, FL client(s) selection has a significant influence on the execution of the remaining steps of an FL process. There have been a variety of FL client(s) selection models proposed in the literature, however, their critical review and/or comparative analysis is much less discussed. This paper brings the scattered FL client(s) selection models onto a single platform by first categorizing them into five categories, followed by providing a detailed analysis of the benefits/shortcomings and the applicability of these models for different FL scenarios. Such understanding can help researchers in academia and industry to develop improved FL client(s) selection models to address the requirement challenges and shortcomings of the current models. Finally, future research directions in the area of FL client(s) selection are also discussed.This article is categorized under: Technologies > Machine Learning Technologies > Artificial Intelligence
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
