Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Wiley Interdisciplin...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Article . 2023
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A review on client selection models in federated learning

Authors: Monalisa Panigrahi; Sourabh Bharti; Arun Sharma 0002;

A review on client selection models in federated learning

Abstract

AbstractFederated learning (FL) is a decentralized machine learning (ML) technique that enables multiple clients to collaboratively train a common ML model without them having to share their raw data with each other. A typical FL process involves (1) FL client(s) selection, (2) global model distribution, (3) local training, and (4) aggregation. As such FL clients are heterogeneous edge devices (i.e., mobile phones) that differ in terms of computational resources, training data quality, and distribution. Therefore, FL client(s) selection has a significant influence on the execution of the remaining steps of an FL process. There have been a variety of FL client(s) selection models proposed in the literature, however, their critical review and/or comparative analysis is much less discussed. This paper brings the scattered FL client(s) selection models onto a single platform by first categorizing them into five categories, followed by providing a detailed analysis of the benefits/shortcomings and the applicability of these models for different FL scenarios. Such understanding can help researchers in academia and industry to develop improved FL client(s) selection models to address the requirement challenges and shortcomings of the current models. Finally, future research directions in the area of FL client(s) selection are also discussed.This article is categorized under: Technologies > Machine Learning Technologies > Artificial Intelligence

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!