
ABSTRACT This study aims to determine Turkish consumers' perceptions and attitudes toward in vitro meat and to investigate the relationship between their perceptions and their willingness to try and consume it. The questionnaire was distributed to potential participants via social media, and the responses of 989 participants were evaluated. The responses regarding the extent to which participants agreed with 32 opinions about in vitro meat were analysed using principal component analysis (PCA). As a result of PCA, four components were obtained explaining 63.3% of the total variance: i) benefits for the environment, and human and animal welfare; ii) safety and reliability; iii) social and ethical concerns; and iv) concerns about being unnatural. Regression equations developed with these components were able to moderately explain ( R 2 ranged between 0.547 and 0.583) the variance observed in consumers' willingness to try, regularly consume, replace conventional meat with and try in vitro meat when recommended by a friend.
Male, Adult, PCA, Meat, Turkey, Adolescent, Veterinary medicine, Consumer Behavior, Middle Aged, Turkish consumers, Young Adult, Surveys and Questionnaires, SF600-1100, Humans, Animals, Original Article, Female, Perception, In Vitro Meat, in vitro meat, consumer perceptions, Aged
Male, Adult, PCA, Meat, Turkey, Adolescent, Veterinary medicine, Consumer Behavior, Middle Aged, Turkish consumers, Young Adult, Surveys and Questionnaires, SF600-1100, Humans, Animals, Original Article, Female, Perception, In Vitro Meat, in vitro meat, consumer perceptions, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
