
doi: 10.1002/vetr.1430
pmid: 35182434
Abstract Background The popularity of brachycephalic dogs continues to increase despite inherent breed health problems. Increased education of current and potential brachycephalic dog owners could reduce the desirability of severely affected dogs. Methods Members of the general public were prospectively recruited to assess their understanding and opinions of brachycephalic breed‐related health problems, before and after an educational intervention on brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome (BOAS). Results A total of 587 people participated. Before the intervention most participants considered characteristics of BOAS to be normal for brachycephalic dogs. Following the intervention this was moderately reduced. Responses highlighted that defining ‘normal’ for a breed is difficult. Referring to a trait as ‘normal’, even in a negative context results in normalisation. 99.7% of participants had an improved understanding of BOAS following the intervention. However, only 53.0% of the total participants and 29.3% of brachycephalic dog owning participants had their opinion of brachycephalic dogs changed. 99.5% of participants believed that potential owners should be more aware of BOAS and 57.3% of brachycephalic dog owners would have liked further information about breed health problems before purchasing their dog. Conclusion Educational interventions may be beneficial in improving understanding and awareness of BOAS however, normalisation of clinical signs of BOAS remains prevalent.
Airway Obstruction, Craniosynostoses, Dogs, Public Opinion, Animals, Humans, Dog Diseases, Syndrome, Breeding
Airway Obstruction, Craniosynostoses, Dogs, Public Opinion, Animals, Humans, Dog Diseases, Syndrome, Breeding
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
