Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Ultrasound in Obstet...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Single umbilical artery in twin pregnancies

Authors: J, Klatt; A, Kuhn; M, Baumann; L, Raio;

Single umbilical artery in twin pregnancies

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveOur purpose was to evaluate the antenatal incidence of single umbilical artery (SUA) in twin pregnancies according to chorionicity and to assess its relationship with outcome.MethodsConsecutive twin pregnancies undergoing ultrasound evaluation at our institutions were included. A targeted sonographic evaluation of the umbilical cord and vessels was performed in all cases. Chorionicity was determined according to standard ultrasound criteria.ResultsA total of 174 twin pregnancies, 100 dichorionic (DC) and 74 monochorionic (MC), were included in the study. An SUA was identified in 17 (9.8%) pregnancies, and in 18 (5.2%) fetuses. No difference was found in the incidence of SUA in DC and MC twins. Among affected pregnancies, all but one DC twin pregnancy were discordant for SUA. Structural and/or chromosomal abnormalities were present in 27.8% of fetuses with SUA. The prevalence of small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses and of discordant birth weight (> 20% discordance) was higher in the SUA group than in the rest of the population, although these differences were not statistically significant. Twin pairs discordant for SUA had significantly higher weight discordance than those with normal umbilical cords. The sonographic cross‐sectional area of the SUA did not appear to show the typical adaptive dilatation usually seen in singleton pregnancies with SUA.ConclusionsThe incidence of SUA in twins is higher than in singletons, with no difference between MC and DC twins. Intrapair discordance for SUA in identical twins provides evidence against an exclusively genetic origin of this anomaly. The apparent failure of compensatory dilatation of the umbilical artery in twins with SUA may explain in part the higher risk for fetal growth restriction in these cases. Copyright © 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Fetal Growth Retardation, Incidence, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy Outcome, Gestational Age, Chorion, Placental Insufficiency, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Single Umbilical Artery, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Diseases in Twins, Humans, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    21
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
21
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze