Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Ultrasound in Obstet...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Article . 2006 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Factors affecting technical success of fetal aortic valve dilation

Authors: L E, Wilkins-Haug; W, Tworetzky; C B, Benson; A C, Marshall; R W, Jennings; J E, Lock;

Factors affecting technical success of fetal aortic valve dilation

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveWe have reported previously that valve dilation enhances growth of cardiac structures and may prevent hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) in fetuses with critical aortic stenosis. We aimed to investigate maternal/fetal factors which may affect the technical success of fetal valvuloplasty, and to describe perinatal complications of the procedure.MethodsThis was a descriptive series of 22 fetuses diagnosed with critical aortic stenosis developing into HLHS which underwent intervention by valvuloplasty. Initially this was attempted using a percutaneous approach; reassessment after our first five attempts, only one of which was successful, led to the introduction of the option of laparotomy. Technical success was defined as balloon inflation across the aortic annulus and a broader jet through the aortic valve as assessed by Doppler. Data collected included body mass index, demographic variables, ultrasound findings and postprocedure interventions.ResultsTechnical success increased significantly if maternal laparotomy was an option (83.3% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.017). Laparotomy was performed in 66.6% (12/18) of cases. There was a learning curve that showed an increase in success rate and decrease in need for laparotomy over the 3‐year study period. Neither the need for laparotomy nor the chances of technical success were predictable by gestational age, body mass index or placental location. Tocolysis was limited to perioperative prophylaxis; one woman experienced wound infection and fluid overload. Postoperatively, three fetuses died and two delivered prematurely, 2 and 7 weeks after intervention.ConclusionFetal aortic valvuloplasty can be performed with technical success, with low fetal loss rate and few maternal complications. While the need for laparotomy cannot be predicted, having it available as an option improves the technical success rate. Copyright © 2006 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Chi-Square Distribution, Gestational Age, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Echocardiography, Doppler, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Catheterization, Treatment Outcome, Pregnancy, Aortic Valve, Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome, Humans, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    68
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
68
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze