Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Ultrasound in Obstet...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Article . 2006 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Prediction of intrapartum Cesarean delivery for non‐reassuring fetal status after a successful external cephalic version by a low pre‐version pulsatility index of the fetal middle cerebral artery

Authors: T Y, Leung; W Y, Fok; L W, Chan; L W, Law; T K, Lau;

Prediction of intrapartum Cesarean delivery for non‐reassuring fetal status after a successful external cephalic version by a low pre‐version pulsatility index of the fetal middle cerebral artery

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo determine whether a pre‐version Doppler assessment of fetal cerebral and umbilical blood flow can predict the ultimate need for intrapartum Cesarean delivery after a successful external cephalic version (ECV).MethodsA prospective observational study on women undergoing ECV between 36 and 38 gestational weeks was performed over a 5‐year period. The pulsatility index (PI) of the fetal middle cerebral artery (MCA) and umbilical artery, heart rate and amniotic fluid index were measured before ECV. Women who had successful ECV were then divided into three groups according to the mode of delivery: (1) vaginal delivery, (2) intrapartum Cesarean delivery for poor progress and (3) intrapartum Cesarean delivery for non‐reassuring fetal status. The fetal blood flow parameters were compared between the groups. Potential predictors were further analyzed using receiver‐operating characteristics curves.ResultsOf 174 women with successful ECV, 140 (80.5%) had vaginal delivery, 19 (10.9%) required emergency intrapartum Cesarean delivery for non‐reassuring fetal status and 15 (8.6%) for poor progress. MCA‐PI was significantly lower in the group with non‐reassuring fetal status. MCA‐PI is predictive of intrapartum Cesarean delivery (area under the curve = 0.68, P = 0.021). The sensitivity and specificity at a cut‐off level of 1.4 were 62.5% and 76%, respectively, while at a cut‐off level of 1.5 they were 68.8% and 63.5%, respectively.ConclusionIntrapartum Cesarean delivery for non‐reassuring fetal status after successful ECV is associated with a lower pre‐version fetal MCA‐PI. Copyright © 2006 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Middle Cerebral Artery, Cesarean Section, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Pregnancy Outcome, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Heart Rate, Fetal, Sensitivity and Specificity, Trial of Labor, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Umbilical Arteries, ROC Curve, Pregnancy, Pulsatile Flow, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Breech Presentation, Version, Fetal

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    16
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
16
Average
Top 10%
Average
bronze