
doi: 10.1002/uog.20
pmid: 12601831
AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the distribution of Doppler pulsatility index (PI) measurements of the umbilical and middle cerebral arteries in singleton fetuses of women with normal uterine artery blood flow and to construct reference ranges for the cerebroplacental PI Doppler ratio.MethodsThe PI was determined in the mid‐portion of the umbilical artery and the mid‐ or distal segment of the middle cerebral artery in 306 normal singleton fetuses. The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio (CPR) was determined from paired measurements. After determination of the best fit, reference ranges were constructed for each parameter against gestational age (GA).ResultsThe PI for the umbilical artery had a linear relationship with GA (umbilical artery PI = − 0.0246 × GA + 1.7791, r2 = 0.4025, P < 0.001). The middle cerebral artery PI and the CPR both showed a quadratic relationship with GA (middle cerebral artery PI = − 0.0058 × GA2 + 0.3335 × GA − 2.7317, r2 = 0.2365, P < 0.01), (CPR = − 0.0059 × GA2 + 0.383 × GA − 4.0636, r2 = 0.2788, P < 0.001).ConclusionThe CPR is not constant throughout gestation. Reference ranges constructed by a standardized Doppler technique may be of benefit in the monitoring of high‐risk pregnancies. Copyright © 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Middle Cerebral Artery, Fetal Growth Retardation, Gestational Age, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Umbilical Arteries, Cross-Sectional Studies, Pregnancy, Reference Values, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Pulsed, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Blood Flow Velocity
Middle Cerebral Artery, Fetal Growth Retardation, Gestational Age, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Umbilical Arteries, Cross-Sectional Studies, Pregnancy, Reference Values, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Pulsed, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Blood Flow Velocity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 440 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
