Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Ultrasound in Obstet...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Article . 2005 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Relationship between cerebroplacental Doppler ratio and birth weight in postdates pregnancies

Authors: H, Lam; W C, Leung; C P, Lee; T T, Lao;

Relationship between cerebroplacental Doppler ratio and birth weight in postdates pregnancies

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo explore the relationship between cerebroplacental Doppler impedance index and birth weight in postdates pregnancies, and to evaluate the use of a combination of Doppler parameters and ultrasound biometry in the prediction of large‐for‐gestational age (LGA) fetuses at 41 weeks of gestation.MethodsThe pulsatility indices of the umbilical (UA‐PI) and middle cerebral (MCA‐PI) arteries, the cerebroplacental pulsatility index ratio (CPR) and the estimated fetal weight (EFW) were obtained in a cohort of 181 ultrasound‐dated pregnancies at 41 weeks' gestation, 2 days before induction of delivery. A regression equation was established and the correlation between umbilical artery impedance and different birth‐weight centile groups was determined. A receiver–operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to compare prediction of LGA fetuses using biometry alone with that using biometry and UA‐PI.ResultsUA‐PI was inversely related to EFW (Spearson's correlation coefficient rho = −0.28, P < 0.001). Logistic regression showed an independent contribution of UA‐PI to the birth‐weight estimation (birth weight = 1356.8 − 232.0 × UA‐PI + 0.65 × EFW). On ROC curve analysis, the prediction of LGA with the regression equation was comparable to that using ultrasound biometry alone.ConclusionUA‐PI was inversely correlated to EFW, but the combination of ultrasound biometry and UA‐PI compared with biometry alone showed similar prediction of LGA fetuses in postdates pregnancies. Further prospective trials on larger populations or groups with a higher prevalence of LGA fetuses would be needed to validate the use of the new formula. Copyright © 2005 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Middle Cerebral Artery, Infant, Newborn, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Sensitivity and Specificity, Statistics, Nonparametric, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Umbilical Arteries, Fetal Macrosomia, Infant, Postmature, ROC Curve, Pregnancy, Pulsatile Flow, Birth Weight, Humans, Regression Analysis, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!