
AbstractObjectiveTo compare automated measurements of the fetal left myocardial performance index (MPI) with manual measurements for absolute value, repeatability and waveform acceptability.MethodsThis was a multicenter international online study using images from uncomplicated, morphologically normal singleton pregnancies (16–38 weeks' gestation). Single Doppler ultrasound cardiac cycle images of 25 cases were selected, triplicated and randomized (n = 75). Six senior observers, unaware of the repetition of images, manually calculated MPI for each waveform and the results were compared with automation. Intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and 95% CI. The agreement between each observer's manual MPI measurements and corresponding automated measurements was evaluated using Bland–Altman plots and ICCs with 95% CI. The degree of variation between experts in the classification of fetal MPI waveform quality was assessed using individual cardiac cycle left MPI images previously classified by two authors as ‘optimal’, ‘suboptimal’ or ‘unacceptable’, with 30 images selected for each quality group. Ten images in each category were duplicated and the resulting 120 images were randomized and then classified online by five observers. The kappa statistic (κ) was used to demonstrate interobserver and intraobserver agreement and agreement of classifications by the five observers.ResultsThe automated measurement software returned the same value for any given image, resulting in an ICC of 1.00. Manual measurements had intraobserver repeatability ICC values ranging from 0.69 to 0.97, and the interobserver reproducibility ICC was 0.78. Comparison of automated vs manual MPI absolute measurements for each observer gave ICCs ranging from 0.77 to 0.96. Interobserver image quality classification agreement gave k = 0.69 (P < 0.001), and the intraobserver agreement was variable (κ ranging from 0.40 to 0.81).ConclusionsAutomated fetal MPI provides superior repeatability and reproducibility to manual methodology. Additionally, experts vary significantly when classifying suitability of fetal MPI waveforms. Automated MPI may facilitate clinical translation by removing human subjectivity. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
anzsrc-for: 3215 Reproductive Medicine, anzsrc-for: 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, 610, 32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Gestational Age, Cardiovascular, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, anzsrc-for: 32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Fetal Heart, Pregnancy, 616, Prenatal, Humans, cardiac MPI, Prospective Studies, anzsrc-for: 111401 Foetal Development and Medicine, Ultrasonography, automation, Observer Variation, Doppler, Reproducibility of Results, 3215 Reproductive Medicine, Echocardiography, Doppler, fetus, Echocardiography, anzsrc-for: 3202 Clinical sciences, Female, Software
anzsrc-for: 3215 Reproductive Medicine, anzsrc-for: 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, 610, 32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Gestational Age, Cardiovascular, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, anzsrc-for: 32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Fetal Heart, Pregnancy, 616, Prenatal, Humans, cardiac MPI, Prospective Studies, anzsrc-for: 111401 Foetal Development and Medicine, Ultrasonography, automation, Observer Variation, Doppler, Reproducibility of Results, 3215 Reproductive Medicine, Echocardiography, Doppler, fetus, Echocardiography, anzsrc-for: 3202 Clinical sciences, Female, Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
