Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Ultrasound in Obstet...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Article . 2003 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Nuchal translucency thickness measurement: repeatability using a virtual ultrasound scanner

Authors: V R, Newey; D K, Nassiri; A, Bhide; B, Thilaganathan;

Nuchal translucency thickness measurement: repeatability using a virtual ultrasound scanner

Abstract

AbstractAimTo use a PC‐based virtual ultrasound scanner (VirUS) in the investigation of inter‐ and intraoperator nuchal translucency (NT) thickness measurement repeatability of experienced ultrasound operators.MethodsRealistic fetal ultrasound images of defined NT thickness were simulated with VirUS with emulation of scanner gain and time‐gain compensation and gain‐dependent echo size changes. A set of 50 images was generated with uniformly distributed NT thickness (range, 1–5 mm at 1‐mm intervals) and translucency angle (mean ± standard deviation of ± 2.52° ± 1.85° about the horizontal). Operators (n = 13) measured NT thickness in the image set on three occasions separated by at least 1 day, giving 150 measurements per operator (total measurements, 1950).ResultsInter‐ and intraoperator repeatabilities were ± 0.41 mm and ± 0.22 mm, respectively (at the 95% confidence level). There were significant correlations between repeatability and mean measured NT thickness (r = − 0.72, P = 0.005 at 4‐mm interval), between gain and mean measured NT thickness (P ≤ 0.002, n = 8/13) and between gain and repeatability coefficient (P < 0.01, n = 6/13).DiscussionVirUS provides a consistent NT audit environment and demonstrates the need to both optimize repeatability vs. mean measured thickness and to set gain consistently. The technique has potential in operator training. Copyright © 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

Observer Variation, Pregnancy, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Computer Simulation, Female, Neck, Ultrasonography, Prenatal

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    20
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
20
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze