
doi: 10.1002/uog.124
pmid: 12808678
AbstractAimTo use a PC‐based virtual ultrasound scanner (VirUS) in the investigation of inter‐ and intraoperator nuchal translucency (NT) thickness measurement repeatability of experienced ultrasound operators.MethodsRealistic fetal ultrasound images of defined NT thickness were simulated with VirUS with emulation of scanner gain and time‐gain compensation and gain‐dependent echo size changes. A set of 50 images was generated with uniformly distributed NT thickness (range, 1–5 mm at 1‐mm intervals) and translucency angle (mean ± standard deviation of ± 2.52° ± 1.85° about the horizontal). Operators (n = 13) measured NT thickness in the image set on three occasions separated by at least 1 day, giving 150 measurements per operator (total measurements, 1950).ResultsInter‐ and intraoperator repeatabilities were ± 0.41 mm and ± 0.22 mm, respectively (at the 95% confidence level). There were significant correlations between repeatability and mean measured NT thickness (r = − 0.72, P = 0.005 at 4‐mm interval), between gain and mean measured NT thickness (P ≤ 0.002, n = 8/13) and between gain and repeatability coefficient (P < 0.01, n = 6/13).DiscussionVirUS provides a consistent NT audit environment and demonstrates the need to both optimize repeatability vs. mean measured thickness and to set gain consistently. The technique has potential in operator training. Copyright © 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Observer Variation, Pregnancy, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Computer Simulation, Female, Neck, Ultrasonography, Prenatal
Observer Variation, Pregnancy, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Computer Simulation, Female, Neck, Ultrasonography, Prenatal
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
