
doi: 10.1002/uog.10130
pmid: 22045546
AbstractObjectivesTo estimate the risk of preterm delivery of twin pregnancies based upon sonographic cervical length measurement and gestational age at measurement.MethodsTwin pregnancies that delivered between 1999 and 2005 and that underwent sonographic measurement of cervical length between 13 and 34 + 6 weeks' gestation were identified and a retrospective review performed. Women with anomalous pregnancies, multifetal reduction, cerclage placement or medically indicated deliveries before 35 weeks were excluded. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the risk of preterm delivery before 35 weeks.ResultsA total of 561 women underwent 2975 sonographic cervical length measurements during the study period. The rate of preterm delivery before 35 weeks was 19.4%. The risk of delivery before 35 weeks decreased by approximately 5% for each additional mm of cervical length (odds ratio (OR) 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93–0.97); P < 0.001) and by approximately 6% for each additional week at which the cervical length was measured (OR 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92–0.96); P < 0.001).ConclusionThe gestational age at which cervical length is measured is an important consideration when estimating the risk of spontaneous preterm birth in twins. The risk of preterm delivery is increased at earlier gestational ages and as cervical length decreases. Copyright © 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Adult, Infant, Newborn, Twins, Gestational Age, Cervix Uteri, California, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Logistic Models, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Cervical Length Measurement, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Humans, Premature Birth, Female, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Infant, Newborn, Twins, Gestational Age, Cervix Uteri, California, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Logistic Models, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Cervical Length Measurement, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Humans, Premature Birth, Female, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
