
doi: 10.1002/tox.20166
pmid: 16528689
AbstractTo evaluate the genotoxicity of hospital wastewater, we drew up a simplified protocol based on two well‐known tests: the SOS chromotest and the Ames fluctuation test. Three concentrations of wastewater samples were directly tested without extraction or concentration. By fixing three significance levels in genotoxicity response for each test, we could classify the samples in five categories ranging from nongenotoxic to highly genotoxic. This simplified classification thus constitutes an invaluable help in making the nonscientist public aware of the genotoxic risk of hospital wastewater and can be applied in a screening approach to chemicals in the environment. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Environ Toxicol 21: 141–146, 2006.
Mutagenicity Tests, Water, Medical Waste, Risk Assessment, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Hospitals, Escherichia coli, France, Environmental Monitoring
Mutagenicity Tests, Water, Medical Waste, Risk Assessment, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Hospitals, Escherichia coli, France, Environmental Monitoring
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
