Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao The Structural Desig...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Shear Performance of the GFRP Bolt Interface Between the GFRP Profile and UHPC/Concrete Slabs

Authors: Zhang Pu; Zimu Wang; Tiezheng Guan; Xianghua Tao; Ye Liu; Zhaoxu Yang; Hao Wang; +1 Authors

Shear Performance of the GFRP Bolt Interface Between the GFRP Profile and UHPC/Concrete Slabs

Abstract

ABSTRACTIn order to assess the feasibility of employing glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bolts as a corrosion‐resistant solution for composite structures comprising GFRP and ultrahigh‐performance concrete (UHPC), the shear performance of GFRP bolts interface between UHPC and GFRP was investigated through push‐out tests. A total of seventeen GFRP–concrete push‐out specimens were tested, including eleven GFRP–UHPC specimens with a GFRP bolt interface, two GFRP–UHPC specimens with a steel bolt interface, and four GFRP–concrete specimens with a GFRP bolt interface. The experimental parameters included the concrete strength, bolt type, bolt embedment length (hbolt), bolt number (nbolt), bolt spacing (sbolt), and bolt diameter (dbolt). The results revealed three failure modes, that is, bolt shear shank failure, concrete failure, and GFRP flange shear failure. Under the same design parameters, the ultimate bearing capacity (Pu) of GFRP bolt pull‐out specimens is 72.4% and 49% of 4.8 grade steel bolt and 8.8 grade steel bolt pull‐out specimens, respectively. The application of UHPC prevents concrete compression failure. Increasing the dbolt and the nbolt can significantly enhance the Pu of the specimen, and the sbolt and hbolt have limited impacts on the Pu. The “bilinear” model was proposed to predict the load–slip curve of the GFRP bolt interface between the FRP–UHPC push‐out specimens. Based on the experimental data, a calculation method was proposed to calculate the ultimate shear capacity of the GFRP bolt interface between the FRP‐UHPC specimens.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!