
pmid: 2905530
AbstractThe interaction of catecholamines epinephrine (E) and norepinephrine (NE) (1.0–100 μM) and excitatory amino acids on motoneurons of the isolated superfused frog spinal cord was investigated by sucrose gap recordings from ventral roots. Exposure of the cord to E or NE 30 sec prior to application of L‐aspartate or L‐glutamate reduced the motoneuron depolarizations produced by the amino acids. The reduction of responses to the mixed receptor agonists L‐glutamate and L‐aspartate may be the result of opposite actions of the catecholamines on the activation of specific excitatory receptors by the amino acids. Thus, E and NE facilitated depolarizations caused by application of N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) and depressed those produced by quisqualate. The effect on NMDA responses appeared to ne β‐adrenoceptor mediated because it was mimicked by the β‐agonist isoprotereno and blocked by propranolol. The effect on quisqualate depolarizations appeared to require activation of α2‐adrenoceptors; it was mimicked by the α2‐agonists clonidine and α‐methylnorepinephrine and antagonized by yohimbine and piperoxan. These results are important in understanding the actions of catecholamines on reflex transmission in spinal pathways which use excitatory amino acids as transmitters.
Motor Neurons, Aspartic Acid, Oxadiazoles, Kainic Acid, N-Methylaspartate, Epinephrine, Rana pipiens, Isoproterenol, Glutamic Acid, Quisqualic Acid, Yohimbine, In Vitro Techniques, Membrane Potentials, Norepinephrine, Glutamates, Spinal Cord, Reference Values, Animals, Amino Acids
Motor Neurons, Aspartic Acid, Oxadiazoles, Kainic Acid, N-Methylaspartate, Epinephrine, Rana pipiens, Isoproterenol, Glutamic Acid, Quisqualic Acid, Yohimbine, In Vitro Techniques, Membrane Potentials, Norepinephrine, Glutamates, Spinal Cord, Reference Values, Animals, Amino Acids
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
