Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Starch - Stärkearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Starch - Stärke
Article . 1996 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Production of Single Cell Protein from Cassava Starch in Air‐lift Fermenter byCephalosporium eichhorniae

Authors: S. Varavinit; P. Srithongkum; C. De‐Eknamkul; A. Assavanig; K. Charoensiri;

Production of Single Cell Protein from Cassava Starch in Air‐lift Fermenter byCephalosporium eichhorniae

Abstract

AbstractBatch and continuous cultivations were used to investigate the single cell protein (SCP) production byCephalosporium eichhorniae152 in an air‐lift reactor. The fungus was grown in an 8L air‐lift fermenter. The culture medium consisted of cassava as a sole‐carbon source, (NH4)2SO4as a nitrogen source and KH2PO4as a buffering agent. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 3.8 and was controlled during fermentation by using an automatic pH‐controller via 0.5 N NaOH. In batch fermentation, 1% of cassava gave the highest yield of 0.4. The optimum condition for continuous fermentation was 1% cassava in feed medium at a dilution rate of 0.4 h‐1(396 ml/h where 0.35 was the final yield. The productivity of continuous culture was found to be higher than that of the batch culture (0.135 g/l.h versus 0.04 g/lh).

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!