Comparison of syntactic error handling in LR parsers

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Jun 1995 English Publisher:WileyJournal:Software: Practice and Experience, volume 25, pages 657-679 (issn: 0038-0644, eissn: 1097-024X,

Copyright policy )

Authors: DEGANO, PIERPAOLO; Priami C.;

doi: 10.1002/spe.4380250606

handle: 11572/4370 , 11568/20940

Comparison of syntactic error handling in LR parsers

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

AbstractError recovery techniques for LR parsers presented in the literature are described and classified. The techniques considered range from the non‐correcting ones to interactive and incremental ones. Also, some of the techniques presented are compared and evaluated. An example showing the advantages and the disadvantages of each class of strategies is given and is used as a guideline for classifying syntax errors according to the recovery strategies which are more adequate to correct them.

Related Organizations

University of Trento
Italy
University of Pisa
Italy

Keywords

compilers, context‐free grammars, error detection, repair and correction. LR parsers. syntactic errors

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	15
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average