
AbstractPassing compilers through themselves is a well known technique whose major benefit is that any improvement in code generation will result in an improved compiler. Previous reports of work in this area have mentioned that it is possible to validate the compiler by running the compiler through itself a second time and comparing the resulting binary files. This paper is designed to clarify this technique which has received little attention and is often misleadingly described.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
