
doi: 10.1002/spe.3391
ABSTRACTMethodologyIn this research, we conducted a case study to establish a foundation for size measurement and effort estimation in DWH projects. We first applied a productivity‐based estimation approach using linear regression with the ISBSG repository to assist organizations without historical data. We then evaluated various machine learning algorithms to improve estimation accuracy. Finally, we tested a combined model that integrates both approaches for estimating effort in external projects.ResultsUsing the ISBSG dataset, linear regression models based on productivity achieved a Mean Magnitude of Relative Error (MMRE) of 0.285. Machine learning algorithms improved accuracy by 22.81%, reducing the MMRE to 0.220. The final model, applied to external projects, yielded MRE values between 0.010 and 0.245.ConclusionThe ISBSG repository is a valuable resource for effort estimation in DWH projects. Combining productivity‐based estimation with machine learning enhances accuracy and predictive performance, making it a more reliable approach than traditional models.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
